Skip to main content

Why Do We Laugh?

 




   We hear laughter all the time—froma  giggle to a snicker to a full-blown belly laugh. Laughter is undoubtedlya common human behavior, yet it has vexed scientists for centuries. To this day, the question “Why do we laugh?” remains a much-debated topic.


   An apparent answer to the question would be that we laugh when we think something is funny. In this case, laughter—the contractions of facial muscles accompanied by an audible sound ranging from a quiet titter to a loud cackle—would be the physiological response to humor. This might be the answer, but it’s not the full story. The reasons that we need this response are more complicated than you’d think.

  

    As it turns out, studying laughter is no Joking matter, according to Robert R.P rovine, professor of psychology andn euroscience at the University of Maryland. Provine, the author of the book, has conducted numerous studies on mirth.“ Most laughter is not in response to jokes or humor,” says Provine. Most of it occurs in ordinary conversations, in which nothing at all humorous transpires. In one of his most-publicized studies, Provine observes that laughs can be elicited by a variety of non-joke statements such as “Hey, John, where ya been?” or “How did you do on the test?”“ It is about relationships between people,” claims Provine. “We don’t decide to laugh at these moments. Our brain makes the decision for us. These curious ‘ha ha ha’s’ are bits of the social glue that e3bond relationships.”

  

   Provine believes that human laughter predated human speech by millions of years. Before speech, laughter was a primary form of communication.“ Laughter,” says Provine,“ evolved from the panting behavior of our ancient primate ancestors.” Apes and other animals, including rats, make “laugh-like” sounds and high-pitched vocalizations while playing, but it would be erroneous to equate them with human laughter.


   However, “When we laugh, we’re often communicating playful intent. So laughter has a bonding function between individuals in a group,” says Provine. While most laughter is a positive behavior, it can have negative intent. Pointing out one social function of  laughter, Provine cites the difference between “laughing with” and “laughing at” someone. “People who laugh at others may be trying to force them to conform or casting them out of the group,” he says. While studies have yet to prove that laughter is the best medicine or has any appreciable degree of health benefits, for that matter, Provine notes, “If we enjoy laughing, isn’t that reason enough to laugh? Do you really need a prescription?”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Causes Volcanic Lightning?

      On March 10, 2010, Eyjafjallajökull volcano, a caldera in Iceland covered by an ice cap, erupted. It sent plumes of clouds across most of Europe and the Atlantic Ocean. Photos of the eruption show lightning originating and ending in the cloud of ash that hovered over the volcanic opening.    The largest volcanic storms are similar to supercell thunderstorms that spread across the American Midwest. But while those thunderstorms are fairly well understood, volcanic lightning still remains mysterious. The remote location of volcanoes and infrequent eruptions make volcanic lightning difficult to study. In general, lightning occurs through the separation of positively and negatively charged particles. Differences in the aerodynamics of the particles separate the positive and negative. When the difference in charge is great, electrons flow between the positive and negative regions. A lightning bolt is a natural way of correcting the charge distributi...

Will Disease Drive Us All to Extinction ?

      Virulent infectious diseases and parasites have long been shown to be a significant cause of decline in biological populations. But can disease lead to the actual extinction of the host species—such as humankind?    Scientists attempt to determine the extinction-threatening effects of disease by first studying its role in historical extinctions. But proving that infectious disease is responsible for past extinctions is tricky business. After all, the extinct species is not around for scientific investigation. Even if a pathogen or parasite were discovered in a disappearing population, it would not prove that the pathogen itself was responsible for the decline.      However, reasonable evidence exists that historical extinctions and extirpations—local extinctions in which a speciesc eases to exist in the specific geographic area of study—are at least partlya ttributable to infectious disease. Avian malaria and bird pox are believe...

Is the Y Chromosome Doomed?

     Humans store their genes in 23 pairs of chromosomes, 22 of which are identically matched. The 23rd is a two-sided biological coin—twin Xs mean you’re female; an X and a Y, male. Chromosome pairs often trade bits of DNA in a process called recombination, the purpose of which is to keep genes functioning properly. Talk of men’s path toward extinction began in the late 1990s, when it was discovered that the human Y chromosome, which is stumpy compared with the X, does not share enough genetic material with the X to practice recombination. Left without a way to renew damaged genes, the Y would continue to degrade and would eventually disappear, geneticists announced. They slapped an expiration date on the male half of the species of sometime in the next 5 to 10 million years. To get a perspective on this prediction, scientists looked to our closest genetic relatives—the chimps. Because humans and chimpanzees shared a common ancestor 6 million years ago, genet...