Skip to main content

Could a Supernova Wipe Out Life on Earth ?

   


A supernova is a stellar explosion. Incredibly strong, a typical supernova can outshine an entire galaxy at its peak, ejecting a Sun’s worth of stellar mass at a significant fraction of the speed of light within seconds. And here’s the harsh reality: A supernova, if it were close enough, could certainly spell the end of civilization and, perhaps, wipe out all life on Earth. As heavy radioactive elements in the ejected matter decayed, they would produce gamma rays.

    

     These gamma rays would be powerful enough to convert our ozone layer into nitrogen oxides and pure nitrogen, neither of which would protect us from the radiation of space.
    
     The bombardment of solar and cosmic rays would destroy key parts of the ecosystem, especially plankton and coral reefs. With the collapse of these systems, the oceanic biome would likely collapse, leading to a mass extinction that would vibrate across the food chain. Given long enough exposure, the bombardment of cosmic and solar rays would threaten and, eventually, wipe out surface life— including humankind—everywhere. If any life survived, it would likely be microbes hiding deep inside Earth’s crust.
    
     As scary as this scenario is, it is also extremely unlikely. In cosmic terms, that supernova would have to be awfully close to cause any real damage. Powerful, Type Ia supernovas dim significantly beyond 75 light-years, and less powerful Type II supernovas are unlikely to cause significant damage at a distance greater than 25 light-years. Thankfully, there are no stars close enough and massive enough to go supernova. The nearest candidate is IK Pegasi, safely 150 light-years away (and creeping even further away from us). Luckily for us, of the 200 to 400 million stars in the Milky Way, an average of three go supernova every century. This isn’t something we have to worry about any time soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Will the Universe End?

    In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is not in fact static, but expanding. In the years following his discovery, cosmologists took up the implications of the discovery, asking how long the universe had been expanding, what forces caused the expansion, and whether it will ever cease.    Cosmologists are pretty confident about the first question: just shy of 14 billion years. A great deal of evidence supports the predominant answer to the second question: The universe rapidly emerged from a singularity in an event that cosmologists call the Big Bang. The third question is a bit more mysterious, and the answer relies on an obscure, confounding phenomenon known as dark energy. The density of dark energy in the universe determines its ultimate fate. In one scenario, the universe does not possess enough dark energy to forever counteract its own gravity and thus ends in a “Big Crunch.” Under this scenario, the universe’s gravity will overcome its expansio...

What Causes Volcanic Lightning?

      On March 10, 2010, Eyjafjallajökull volcano, a caldera in Iceland covered by an ice cap, erupted. It sent plumes of clouds across most of Europe and the Atlantic Ocean. Photos of the eruption show lightning originating and ending in the cloud of ash that hovered over the volcanic opening.    The largest volcanic storms are similar to supercell thunderstorms that spread across the American Midwest. But while those thunderstorms are fairly well understood, volcanic lightning still remains mysterious. The remote location of volcanoes and infrequent eruptions make volcanic lightning difficult to study. In general, lightning occurs through the separation of positively and negatively charged particles. Differences in the aerodynamics of the particles separate the positive and negative. When the difference in charge is great, electrons flow between the positive and negative regions. A lightning bolt is a natural way of correcting the charge distributi...

Why Do We Have Fingerprints?

      Many  scientists once thought fingerprints help us hold onto objects. From an evolutionary perspective, getting a better grip on tools or weapons would have made life easier for early humans. In 2009, Dr. Roland Ennos of Manchester University designed an experiment that tested the gripping power of our fingerprints. He used a machine equipped with weights to pull strips of Perspex, a kind of acrylic, across a subject’s fingertips. The machine measured the amount of friction created as the acrylic passed over the tip. In the real world, a high amount of friction between two solid objects in contact with each other would indicate a better grip. In the experiment, the fingertips created some friction on the acrylic, but not as much as Ennos had expected.     Ennos compares our fingerprints to the tires on a race car. Ridges in the tire reduce the surface area of the tire in contact with the road, which reduces friction. The ridges on fingertips have the ...